Customer Satisfaction Template
New Feature Satisfaction Survey Template
Every new feature is a promise. This template shows if it lives up to expectations, captures first impressions, and highlights issues early-so you can polish fast and keep users engaged.
Decision context
New Feature Satisfaction Survey helps reduce a real decision risk.
Run this right after launching a new feature or beta. Perfect for learning if setup works, if usage feels smooth, and if people plan to stick with it-or if tweaks are needed.
Template preview
What is inside the template
The template combines questions and surveys with focused follow-up prompts, so the team can collect the specific evidence described in the source study.
Study spine
A focused study spine, ready to adapt.
The preview shows the shape of the study: the stimulus or task, the core prompts, and the follow-up evidence Fred can help you collect.
Prompt 01
Linear Scale
How satisfied are you with [Feature]?
Scale: 1= Very dissatisfied, 10= Very satisfied
Prompt 02
Linear Scale
How would you rate your overall experience with [Feature]?
Scale: 1= Awful, 10= Perfect
Prompt 03
Yes/No
Did you experience any issues accessing or setting up [Feature]?
Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.
Prompt 04
Long text
If yes, what was the issue?
Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.
Prompt 05
Yes/No
Did the [Feature] work as expected?
Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.
Prompt 06
Long text
If not, what didn't work as expected?
Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.
Methods included
Research methods used by the template.
The preview above shows the template-specific prompts and tasks. This section explains the method types in general, so teams understand what each one is for.
Questions and Surveys
Structured response capture
Method purpose
Survey questions collect text, scale, choice, date, numerical, or grid responses so teams can compare user feedback consistently.
Workflow in Fred
From template to decision-ready evidence
Fred gives you a structured starting point for the study, then helps you collect responses and turn recurring signals into evidence your team can review.
- 01Start from the prebuilt structureOpen the new feature satisfaction survey template, then adapt the placeholder stimulus, task, or wording to match your product context.
- 02Collect focused responsesParticipants complete the questions and surveys flow and answer the follow-up prompts that capture the decision signal.
- 03Review patterns and confidenceFind out if users are satisfied, what excites them, and what breaks.
- 04Share a decision-ready reportTurn the recurring evidence into a clear recommendation for the product, design, content, or research decision at hand.
Evidence output
What you can decide after running this template
The output should help the team move from opinions to concrete evidence about what users understood, selected, completed, preferred, or questioned.
Signal
Find out if users are satisfied, what excites them, and what breaks.
Evidence
See whether they'll keep using the feature and gather direct feedback to guide improvements and boost adoption.
Action
Use the results to refine the experience before the decision becomes expensive to change.
Method fit
Use this template when the decision needs focused evidence.
Use this section to decide whether the template is the right starting point, or whether the research question needs a broader plan.
Good fit
Run this right after launching a new feature or beta. Perfect for learning if setup works, if usage feels smooth, and if people plan to stick with it-or if tweaks are needed.
Use another method
You need statistically representative market sizing rather than directional research evidence. You have not defined the stimulus, task, concept, page, or feature that participants should evaluate. You need a broad discovery program instead of a compact template-led study.
Who it helps
Different teams can use the same evidence for different decisions.
The template keeps the study compact enough for a sprint, while still giving each role the evidence they need to move the decision forward.
Customer Success Lead
Problem
Needs evidence for a customer satisfaction decision without designing the study from scratch.
Outcome
Gets a ready structure for collecting questions and surveys evidence.
UX Researcher
Problem
Needs a repeatable method structure that keeps questions, tasks, and follow-ups focused.
Outcome
Gets a study spine that can be adapted, launched, and reported with less setup work.
Product Manager
Problem
Needs to reduce uncertainty before a product, messaging, or experience decision hardens.
Outcome
Gets decision-ready signals that can be shared with the team before the next sprint commitment.
Related resources
Continue from this template to related methods and decisions.
Use these links to connect the template to the broader Fred workflow and supporting educational content.
FAQ
Practical details before you run the template.
Short answers for teams deciding whether this template fits the research decision in front of them.
Start the study
Use this template to collect evidence before the decision hardens.
Start with a structured study, collect focused evidence, and turn the results into a clearer product decision.
Output
A focused study, a clearer decision, and evidence your team can inspect.