Usability Testing Template

Navigation Information Scent Test Template

Information scent determines whether users feel they're on the right path toward their goal. This template helps you evaluate how well your labels, layout, and cues signal what's behind each navigation element-revealing where clarity breaks and where expectations fail.

Fred study builder showing a prebuilt workflow for Navigation Information Scent Test Template.
Start from a structured study, customize the prompts, and collect decision-ready evidence.

Decision context

Navigation Information Scent Test helps reduce a real decision risk.

Use this when users report feeling "lost," when analytics show high backtracking, or when redesigning navigation. Ideal before shipping new menus, categories, or dashboard layouts.

Template preview

What is inside the template

The template combines first click + questions and surveys with focused follow-up prompts, so the team can collect the specific evidence described in the source study.

Study spine

A focused study spine, ready to adapt.

The preview shows the shape of the study: the stimulus or task, the core prompts, and the follow-up evidence Fred can help you collect.

Task 01

First-Click Testing

Where would you click first to view your past orders?

Ask participants to complete this task so the team can observe where the experience creates friction.

Prompt 02

Yes/No

Did you feel confident that this was the right place to start?

Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.

Prompt 03

Long text

What made this option feel like the correct location?

Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.

Prompt 04

Long text

If you hesitated or considered another option, what caused the uncertainty?

Capture the response as part of the study so the team can compare patterns across participants.

Prompt 05

Multiple Choice - Multiple select

Which elements influenced your decision?

Options: Label text, Icon, Placement, Familiar patterns, Color/visual hierarchy

Methods included

Research methods used by the template.

The preview above shows the template-specific prompts and tasks. This section explains the method types in general, so teams understand what each one is for.

First Click

Starting-point clarity

Method purpose

First-click testing shows where users go first when asked to complete a task, exposing weak labels, hierarchy, or information scent.

Questions and Surveys

Structured response capture

Method purpose

Survey questions collect text, scale, choice, date, numerical, or grid responses so teams can compare user feedback consistently.

Workflow in Fred

From template to decision-ready evidence

Fred gives you a structured starting point for the study, then helps you collect responses and turn recurring signals into evidence your team can review.

  1. 01Start from the prebuilt structureOpen the navigation information scent test template, then adapt the placeholder stimulus, task, or wording to match your product context.
  2. 02Collect focused responsesParticipants complete the first click + questions and surveys flow and answer the follow-up prompts that capture the decision signal.
  3. 03Review patterns and confidenceDiscover whether users choose the expected paths, which labels mislead them, and where information scent is weak.
  4. 04Share a decision-ready reportTurn the recurring evidence into a clear recommendation for the product, design, content, or research decision at hand.

Evidence output

What you can decide after running this template

The output should help the team move from opinions to concrete evidence about what users understood, selected, completed, preferred, or questioned.

Signal

Discover whether users choose the expected paths, which labels mislead them, and where information scent is weak.

Evidence

Learn how users interpret your terminology and which design elements support or undermine findability.

Action

Use the results to refine the experience before the decision becomes expensive to change.

Method fit

Use this template when the decision needs focused evidence.

Use this section to decide whether the template is the right starting point, or whether the research question needs a broader plan.

Good fit

Use this when users report feeling "lost," when analytics show high backtracking, or when redesigning navigation. Ideal before shipping new menus, categories, or dashboard layouts.

Use another method

You need statistically representative market sizing rather than directional research evidence. You have not defined the stimulus, task, concept, page, or feature that participants should evaluate. You need a broad discovery program instead of a compact template-led study.

Who it helps

Different teams can use the same evidence for different decisions.

The template keeps the study compact enough for a sprint, while still giving each role the evidence they need to move the decision forward.

UX Researcher

Problem

Needs evidence for a usability testing decision without designing the study from scratch.

Outcome

Gets a ready structure for collecting first click + questions and surveys evidence.

Product Manager

Problem

Needs to reduce uncertainty before a product, messaging, or experience decision hardens.

Outcome

Gets decision-ready signals that can be shared with the team before the next sprint commitment.

FAQ

Practical details before you run the template.

Short answers for teams deciding whether this template fits the research decision in front of them.

Start the study

Use this template to collect evidence before the decision hardens.

Start with a structured study, collect focused evidence, and turn the results into a clearer product decision.

Output

A focused study, a clearer decision, and evidence your team can inspect.