Insight Signals

See what people say, do, and appear to react to in one evidence layer.

Fred keeps AI-assisted reaction cues, prosody context, eye tracking, interaction context, and AI-generated combined insights attached to the session moment, so teams can interpret behavior with more confidence.

Fred insight signals dashboard with layered participant evidence
Behavioral signals matter when they stay tied to the task, quote, screen, and source moment where they happened.

Insight Signals are interpretation aids, not stand-alone factual determinations about what a person truly feels, intends, or believes. Review the AI Transparency and Customer Attestation pages for workflow boundaries and external-upload requirements.

At a glance

What Insight Signals add to session review

Insight Signals in Fred help teams review session behavior with more context while keeping interpretation grounded in evidence. The workflow can keep AI-assisted reaction cues, prosody context, eye tracking, interaction signals, and AI-generated combined insights attached to the task, quote, screen, and participant moment that produced them. These signals are research-support context, not definitive readings of emotion or intent; their value comes from helping teams revisit moments of hesitation, friction, attention, or confidence during synthesis and reporting.

Attached context

Signals stay close to the task, quote, screen, and participant moment that produced them.

Human review

AI-assisted cues support interpretation, but teams keep judgment over meaning, severity, and priority.

Report handoff

The strongest moments can move into synthesis and stakeholder reporting with source context intact.

Session interpretation risk

Session evidence gets flattened when behavior loses context.

The transcript explains what was said, not always what happened.

Hesitation, frustration, surprise, and reaction context can be visible in the session but missing from the final evidence trail.

Signals become noise when they leave the moment.

AI-assisted reaction cues, prosody, gaze, interaction, or AI-generated signal summaries are only useful if the team can inspect them next to the task, screen, quote, and participant context.

Playback stays isolated from the report.

The most revealing behavioral moments lose force if they cannot travel into synthesis and stakeholder review with their source intact.

Evidence layer

Richer signals should make session review clearer, not busier.

Fred puts signal detection and AI-generated combined insights inside the research workflow, so they can support interpretation, prioritization, and report handoff without becoming detached analytics.

Fred attention and interaction signal view
Eye tracking and interaction cues become useful when AI can combine them with reaction context, prosody, and source context.

Moment

Anchor signals to the task moment that produced them.

Fred keeps reaction cues, prosody, gaze, interaction, and AI signal summaries close to the screen state and participant behavior that gave them meaning.

Review

Interpret behavior without switching to a separate toolchain.

The team can revisit what people said, how their voice changed, how they appeared to react, where they focused, and which combined insights AI surfaced inside the same evidence workflow.

Decide

Carry the strongest moments into reporting.

Signals become useful when they combine into clearer explanations of severity, confidence, and priority during decision review.

Better playback

More signal is only better when it explains the decision.

Fred keeps reaction cues, prosody, gaze, interaction, and AI signal summaries tied to the session, then lets the strongest evidence travel into synthesis and reporting.

01

Signals stay in context

AI-assisted reaction cues, prosody, gaze, interaction, and AI signal summaries remain attached to the same participant moment.

02

Playback becomes more useful

The team can revisit not just what happened, but how the participant reacted while it happened.

03

Prioritization gets sharper

Richer evidence helps teams judge severity and confidence more clearly during review.

What teams get back

A sharper read on behavior inside the core research workflow.

Teams can explain not only what happened, but what participants appeared to notice, miss, struggle with, or react to during the task.

Emotion in context

Review reaction shifts without detaching them from the task moment that caused them.

Interaction clarity

Understand where people pause, misclick, or struggle in the flow.

Attention visibility

See where focus goes when the intended journey breaks down.

Evidence-rich handoff

Carry the strongest signal-backed moments into reporting and stakeholder review.

Add richer session context

Make playback more interpretable and more useful.

Bring AI-assisted reaction, prosody, eye tracking, interaction cues, and combined insights into the same workflow where the team already reviews and shares evidence.